I’ve been thinking about what I want to say about this book for a couple days now. Though I enjoyed it very much, I think Eugenides was trying to do too many things at once, leaving me dissatisfied by the end.
-The “marriage plot” is a 19th century literary device. It refers not only to the plot of the novel itself in the Austenian sense (coming-of-age story culminating in a marriage) but also to the “scheme” or the “plot” the heroine and her friends partake in to nab husbands. Like the protagonist—Madeleine Hanna—I’ve enjoyed studying the “marriage plot” novels of 18th and 19th century authors, written at a time when women were literally classified as idiots. Intellectually, they were considered children. Despite this, these brilliant women picked up a pen and wrote books, publishing their big “fuck yous” for everyone to see. Novels by women for women revolve around the marriage plot, producing my favorite opening line of all time: “It is a truth generally acknowledged, that a single man…” We’ve all heard it before. So witty, so sarcastic, so perfect.
Eugenides wants to follow in this great tradition and give us a modern “marriage plot” novel. And at first it works, and I love it. It appeases my narcissism to read about a girl much like me: studying literature simply because she loves to read, taking a class on Victorian love stories and writing about the marriage plot, and fighting with her pretentious classmates in her honors seminar about semiotics. But after the first few “Madeleine chapters” we lose sight of this unifying thread completely…
Summer reading list!!
(Source: dearestdeadbeatrice)
Anyone see Regency House Party? I have to admit I’ve seen it about 10 times. I’m ashamed to say that this old school hetero courtship is somehow comforting—like leave me the hell out of it, but it’s sure fun to watch! If you want to watch some depressing shit, find Manor House. Wow SO sad. Playlist for Regency House Party: 



